Azure Managed Identity vs. Service Principal: What’s the Difference?
If you’re like most companies, you’re not doing a great job managing access to critical cloud applications. Studies reveal that 80% of cyberattacks leverage identity-based techniques, such as phishing and compromised credentials.
When building or securing cloud applications in Azure, identity and access management often ends up being the last thing teams want to worry about — but it’s also one of the most critical. Should you access Azure resources using a Managed Identity or a Service Principal? The answer can make a huge difference in the security, scalability and maintainability of your application.
In this article, we’ll break down the differences between these two approaches, clarify what each option is best suited for and help you understand which to choose depending on your environment. Whether you’re a cloud architect designing scalable infrastructure, a developer deploying code to Azure Functions or an IT lead automating a CI/CD pipeline, knowing the Azure Managed Identity vs. Service Principal trade-offs is key to protecting your Azure environment.
Let’s dive in.
What is a Managed Identity in Azure?
A Managed Identity is a Microsoft-managed service that provides your application with an automatically managed persona in the Azure Active Directory (Azure AD). It allows your application to authenticate to any service that supports Azure AD authentication — without the need to store credentials in your code or config files.
There are two types of managed identity in Azure:
- System-assigned managed identity: Created alongside an Azure service (like a VM or App Service) and tied directly to it. If you delete the resource, the identity goes away with it.
- User-assigned managed identity: Created independently and can be assigned to multiple resources.
With managed identities, Microsoft handles the credential rotation behind the scenes. That means fewer secrets to worry about, less surface area for attackers and a lot less operational overhead for your team.
What is a Service Principal?
A Service Principal is an identity created for use with applications, hosted services and automated tools to access Azure resources. It’s essentially a representation of an application in Azure AD.
Unlike Managed Identities, Service Principals are not tied to a specific Azure resource and must be manually created and configured. You’ll also need to manage the authentication secrets manually. This typically involves using client secrets, which have a limited lifespan and will eventually expire. Alternatively, you might use certificates, which require careful oversight to ensure they’re rotated before they become invalid. Both methods demand proactive monitoring and routine updates to maintain uninterrupted access and avoid potential security gaps.
In many ways, a Service Principal is a more traditional identity model: flexible and powerful but also requiring stricter governance and oversight to maintain security.
Authentication and Credential Management
One of the most critical distinctions between Managed Identities and Service Principals lies in credential management and the associated responsibilities. The functionality is not merely a technical detail but a significant security concern. According to a report by CyberArk, 93% of organizations experienced two or more identity-related breaches in the past year.
When organizations manually handle authentication secrets, the risk of mismanagement increases, potentially leading to security breaches. Selecting the appropriate identity model can substantially mitigate this risk by minimizing human involvement in credential storage, rotation and exposure.
Managed Identity: Let Azure Do the Heavy Lifting
Managed Identities shine here. Because credentials are fully managed by Azure, you never have to create, rotate or revoke them manually. Azure automatically injects authentication tokens into your app’s environment when needed, based on identity permissions granted via role-based access control (RBAC).
These product features create a zero-trust, zero-secret model of identity authentication. Your application code never stores or sees any credentials, reducing the risk of exposure.
From a developer’s perspective, this drastically simplifies deployment and maintenance. There’s no need to integrate external key vaults just to handle authentication, and there’s no panic when a secret is about to expire. Teams can focus on building functionality rather than architecting workarounds to keep credentials secure.
On the operations side, Managed Identities help ensure compliance and security hygiene at scale. When you have dozens — or even hundreds — of services authenticating across your cloud ecosystem, relying on automated ephemeral tokens makes it far easier to maintain oversight and enforce least-privilege access principles. And because identities are tied to specific resources, there’s less risk of creating orphaned credentials that attackers can exploit.
Service Principal: You’re on The Hook for Secrets
Service Principals require you to explicitly manage authentication secrets or certificates. You’re responsible for generating them, storing them securely (typically in something like Azure Key Vault) and rotating them before they expire.
This gives you more control — which can be useful — but also introduces more complexity and risk. If a secret expires or leaks, services can break or be compromised.
Azure Managed Identity vs. Service Principal Use Cases: When to Use Each
Each identity option has its strengths depending on where and how you deploy your application.
When to Use Managed Identity
Managed Identity is ideal when your application runs natively within Azure. It’s purpose-built for scenarios where Azure-hosted services need to authenticate to other Azure resources without exposing credentials. This functionality makes it the go-to solution for streamlining authentication across a wide range of workloads, including:
- Azure Functions: When serverless functions need to access resources like Azure Storage, Key Vault or databases, a managed identity allows seamless authentication with no manual secret management.
- Azure App Services: Web apps and APIs running on Azure App Services can use managed identities to securely call backend resources, eliminating the need to embed secrets in app settings or code.
- Azure Virtual Machines: Managed identities can be assigned to VMs so scripts, background jobs or apps running on the machine can authenticate securely without storing credentials on disk.
- Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) pods: AKS now supports managed identity integration, allowing workloads running in pods to access Azure resources with fine-grained access control and an improved security posture.
- Logic Apps and Azure Data Factory: These services frequently integrate with a variety of Azure and third-party systems. Using managed identities allows them to do so securely, without the burden of managing client secrets or connection strings.
These integrations are secure but also more maintainable. As cloud environments scale, manually managing credentials for each service becomes error-prone and inefficient. Managed Identity streamlines this process by tying authentication directly to Azure’s resource model — making it both scalable and secure by design.
In these cases, the integration is seamless. Your resource gets a system-assigned identity, you grant it access to other resources (like Key Vault, Storage or SQL), and you’re done.
This is the most secure and low-maintenance option if your workloads live entirely within the Azure ecosystem.
When to Use Service Principal
You’ll need a Service Principal when you’re dealing with:
- External or hybrid applications (hosted outside of Azure)
- CI/CD pipelines (e.g., GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps, Jenkins)
- Multi-cloud or on-prem apps that still need Azure resource access
- Terraform, Bicep or ARM templates for infrastructure automation
A Managed Identity won’t work in these cases because your app or tool isn’t directly hosted inside the Azure cloud. A Service Principal provides the authentication mechanism, even if it requires manual management by your IT team or trusted third-party vendor.
Security and Lifecycle Management
Security should be a top priority when choosing between these two identity models. Here’s how they stack up.
Managed Identity: Fewer Credentials, Fewer Problems
Traditional methods often require embedding secrets like API keys or passwords within codebases, which can inadvertently lead to exposure. For instance, a 2025 report highlighted that 23.77 million secrets were leaked on GitHub in 2024 alone, underscoring the risks associated with hardcoded credentials.
Because Managed Identities don’t expose secrets, they significantly reduce the risk of accidentally exposing credentials in code repositories or logs. They also eliminate the need for secret rotation policies because Microsoft handles everything.
From a lifecycle management perspective, Managed Identities tightly couple with the resource’s lifecycle. Delete the resource and the identity will be automatically removed. This feature helps avoid orphaned credentials and ensures tighter security hygiene.
Service Principal: More Flexible, but Higher Risk
Service Principals offer more flexibility — you can use them outside of Azure and tailor them to unique authentication workflows. However, they also introduce greater security risks due to the need to manage secrets.
Without a strong governance model, secrets can expire unexpectedly or leak through code sharing. Organizations need robust rotation policies and secret management tools like Azure Key Vault to minimize risk.
Also, if a Service Principal outlives its original use case (e.g., tied to a now-defunct automation script), it can become a security liability if not properly cleaned up.
Real-world Scenarios: Choosing Azure Managed Identity vs. Service Principal
Let’s walk through a few sample scenarios and determine the right choice.
Scenario 1: Deploying an Azure Function that Reads from Azure Storage
Use Managed Identity. Azure Functions support system-assigned identities, and you can grant storage access using RBAC. No secrets are needed.
Scenario 2: You Have a GitHub Actions Pipeline Deploying Resources into Azure
Use Service Principal. Since GitHub Actions runs outside Azure, a Service Principal is needed to authenticate against Azure AD.
Scenario 3: Running a VM Pulling Secrets from Azure Key Vault
Use Managed Identity. Assign a system-managed identity to the VM and grant it Key Vault access. It’s the most secure and efficient method.
Scenario 4: Managing Multiple Apps Across Azure and AWS and All Need Azure Access
Use Service Principal. If you’re operating across cloud environments, you need the flexibility Service Principals offer — even if that means extra secret management.
Wrap-up: It’s Not Either/or — it’s Context-Driven
The Managed Identity vs. Service Principal decision isn’t about which one is “better.” It’s about choosing the right tool for the job.
Managed Identities make it easy to build secure Azure-native apps without the hassle of credential management. They’re the preferred approach when operating fully within the Azure ecosystem. They’re also safer by design — since there are no secrets to rotate or protect.
Service Principals, on the other hand, remain essential for automation scripts, cross-platform tooling and hybrid scenarios. They offer flexibility that Managed Identities can’t match — but demand extra vigilance when it comes to security and lifecycle management.
Need Help Architecting Azure Secure Access?
Red River helps organizations build secure scalable Azure environments tailored to their needs. Whether you’re deploying cloud-native applications, building DevOps pipelines or implementing hybrid architectures, we’ll guide you on the right authentication strategy — from Managed Identities to Service Principals and everything in between.
Ready to simplify and secure your Azure environment?
Let’s talk about how Red River can help. Reach out today to get started.
Q&A
